Breadcrumb
- Wallace
- Reports
- Applying Summer Learning Eviden...
Applying Summer Learning Evidence
How Texas State Policy Supports Strong Programming
- Author(s)
- Jessy Newman, Briana Garcia, Eliza Laible, and Deborah Moroney
- Publisher(s)
- American Institutes for Research
Summary
How we did this
Between 2020 and 2024, researchers conducted interviews with and administered surveys to staff at more than 60 local education agencies, interviewed the Texas Education Agency and its partners, analyzed program administrative data, reviewed planning tools and resources, and observed programming in a sample of districts.
Something big has been brewing in Texas. In 2019, the legislature passed a historic education finance bill that included an initiative to add up to 30 days to the school-year calendar. One way districts can do this is to offer a voluntary summer learning program. In 2020, the American Institutes for Research, with support from The Wallace Foundation, launched the six-year Texas Summer Learning Study in collaboration with the state education agency and its partners. The study takes a close look at how Texas is drawing on research about what works in summer learning to promote strong programs across the state.
The first report from the study focuses on how the Texas Education Agency has used a competitive grant program to help districts design and run their summer offerings according to evidence-backed principles.
Participating districts commit to developing and running summer programs that:
- add 25–30 days of instruction to the school year;
- run for at least six hours a day, including three hours of academic instruction led by a certified teacher and two hours of enrichment; and
- use instructional materials for reading and math that meet state standards.
To facilitate this work, the state provides:
- funding;
- tools and guidance;
- a learning community for districts to share strategies, success stories, and challenges; expert feedback; and
- individualized technical assistance.
With this support, districts develop comprehensive strategic plans for their summer programs that incorporate 10 research-based design principles:
- Early planning that takes various perspectives into account
- Program design that establishes at least 25 days of instruction for elementary-age students and a mix of academics and enrichment
- A safe, supportive, inclusive environment for young people
- Data-driven budgeting that pinpoints cost efficiencies
- Data collection and continuous improvement that focuses on effective implementation and progress towards state and local goals
- A staffing plan that ensures appropriate student-to-staff ratios and provides for ongoing professional development
- Timely, personalized student recruitment materials and mechanisms to promote regular attendance
- Academic instruction that meets state standards and fits student needs
- Enrichment activities involving sequenced lessons that reinforce academic instruction
- Community partnerships and family engagement that build on existing relationships and prioritize new ones that can expand program offerings
Early findings suggest that districts adopt these principles more frequently, consistently, or with greater fidelity to the evidence when they are required or strongly encouraged by the state.
Texas’s efforts can provide a road map for state education agencies and LEAs that want to apply the evidence base in support of strong summer programming.
Key Takeaways
- The work in Texas suggests that state policies can drive strong summer programming, especially when those policies are bolstered by funding, planning tools, and technical assistance.
- The state’s planning program is flexible, allowing districts to make decisions based on their readiness and community needs.
- Districts perceive individualized technical assistance to be a key to designing and running effective summer programs.
- Drawing on existing research, AIR identified ten principles for summer programs with an academic goal, including operating programs for elementary-age youth for at least 25 days and providing a mix of academics and enrichment activities.